Monday, February 28, 2005
Back !
So why the break ? While in the shower 5 days ago, I was reflecting on what I usually spend my time doing - I figured I spend a fair amount of time reflecting on the game - besides the half an hour I spend blogging everyday and another half surfing the web for news. This here in the United States Of Ignorant Cricketless America not back home where I spend a good deal of time watching matches of varying interests and intensity as well.
And so I thought - what if I decide to take a complete break from cricket for some time ?? I remember during school and college years my parents used to advice me to keep my cricket craze in perspective lest it should hamper my academics. Well I very rarely did it back then. Now however since I felt the need and the urge from within I decided to give it a shot. What would I do with all the time that I did not spend on cricket ? Would I utilize it in some productive work ? Would I waste it away ? Would I discover some new interest or try out some other activity I had never done before ??
I decided to carry out this experiment for 4 days. I noted 3 primary reasons for this exercise:
1. To test my ability to control and conquer myself
2. To be ready for the big India-Pakistan series refreshed
3. To simply carry out and analyse a personal experiment
It was not as hard as I thought it would be. Never did I feel an irresistible temptation to go to good old Cricinfo to check out the latest news - maybe helped by the fact that there were some pretty uninteresting matches going on all around the World. Of course I did read the headlines on Times Of India - I was not going to go out of my way to keep these out - and at times I did drift into thinking about them - the selection of Yuvraj over Kaif in the Indian Test Team being the main tempter. But soon enough I was able to realise it and shut out my thoughts. Also the stray thought of whether Rahul Dravid will scale the heights he did last season did try to enter the mind while walking through the snow but these were similarly dispelled. I accidentally did once land up onto Will's Corridor Of Uncertainty (a very good cricket blog I read regularly) out of habit but moved away within a second as I remembered my resolve.
So I did to a great degree succeed in what I set out to do. So what did I do with the time I saved ? Nothing much !!! I spent a lot more time than I do following tennis - I saw the Dubai Open - a superb match between Federer and Agassi - and little more of work. Although I do not think my net productivity was very greatly increased. So in that respect it didn't really help. Although I realised I can in fact survive without cricket and can indeed think and talk about other topics - something which several people doubted (me included).
Overall I would say yes I can very well survive and conquer myself and that makes me feel good. But I don't think there is too much that I am gaining by it. So I would end by quoting 2 lines from a very famous Hindi song:
"Tere Bina Zindagi Se Koi Shikava To Nahin
Tere Bina Zindagi Bhi Lekin Zindagi Nahin"
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
Pathetic !!
Plus point coming from the match - Ganguly scored 170 - great !! On a day when Dravid scored 6 runs in 2 innings, Laxman 14 in 2 (or something like that) and Tendulkar 4 in 1 the skipper's good form is indeed a respite.
The South vs West match might turn out to be a cracker (indeed it is) what with Kumble and Powar completely destroying Tendulkar, Dravid and Laxman !!! Bowlers rule in this year's Duleep Trophy and that is great news !!
Amidst the slaughter, the good contributions of talented youngster Venugopal Rao need special mention and praise. I don't think it will be long before he makes his way into Team India.
#2 ?!?! What The Hell ?!?!
NZ need to sort out their own problems. They have no batsman to play the #3 role - I asked yesterday why Fleming who should be able to do it is not. The Sinclairs and the Papps for all their worth are not going to be daunting #3s at international level. The bowling is in shambles - Tuffey at his best can be described as a gentle giant who might throw in an odd winning performance here and there. He is out of form. They have oscillated between Styris, WIlson and now Adams and yet none of these really should fill anyone'e heart with terror. Mills has been so-so. They are desperately in need of Oram and preferrably Bond to recover from injuries. Until then it is upto the old warhorses Vettori and Cairns to lend some respectability to the "attack".
Finally, I did not comment on this before, but I simply loved Stephen Fleming's ban on using the A-word. That is the right attitude to have - but needs to be matched with performances. If they keep up that attitude and raise their game several notches NZ may still stand an outside chance.
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
That Sixing Sevening Monkey Fiver Who Should Threeing Three Himself
The title character as can be seen in the picture is going to threeing officiate in the upcoming India Pakistan series.
This could well threeing mean that the series could turn into a fouring lottery what with a twoing, sixing madman in charge. Everyone knows what a fivey fourious umpire he is and a fiving sevening threer of a man. He played a threeing huge role in denying India a series victory over Australia last year.
He has also on several occasions deliberately twoed the Indian players - first Ganguly - (who gave him a oneing threeing zero thank you very much) and then he had the fouring audacity to threeingly and twoingly insult and humiliate an absolute gentleman like Rahul Dravid in the VB Series.
Pakistan aren't too amused about his twoing fiving ways either - so it may well turn out to be a lottery of a match whenever he is in charge. And now the ICC is going to fouringly celebrate the fivey fact that this Monkey-fiver is completing his sixing 100 Test Matches !! (Five the foury six of him !! For sixing God's sake)
And that too the hallowed turf of Eden Gardens will be fiving desecrated by his foury oney sixy self. Really sixing sad. I hope that the oner, sixer, fiver, threer, fourer, twoer, sevener decides to sevening call it a sixing day after this. World Cricket is better off without fiving sevening sixers of umpires like him.
What Rubbish !!!
OK. I need to find answers to a few questions. Why this whole mess ? Why can't the BCCI give it to Zee if it is the highest bidder ? Because it has no prior experience ? OK .. if that is the case why can't it give it to ESPN-STAR ? Because clearly I think they have stated that monetary value of the bid would not be the sole criterion ?? Why can it not let Zee go to hell in that scenario ?
OK. I realise that the above questions are a bit naive but they were necessary to get the basics right. Now, the situation as I understand is that the BCCI had in fact decided to give the rights to ESPN-STAR but Zee who had the highest bid went to court. Now once it enters the courts in India, it can be a real mess. (Don't get me wrong - I have great respect for the judiciary of India and their judgements) The problem is the delay, isn't it ?? A temporary solution was found for the Australia series but clearly that resulted in great losses for the BCCI.
I think with the delicate political angle to the series, the Government could persuade the courts towards a speedy resolution one way or the other without a compromise as happened last time. Until such time, our respected Board President better keep his mouth shut and start selecting his X1 for the warm-up match in Dharamshala.
Monday, February 21, 2005
Bring Back Dizzy !!!
Australia might have won the first match courtesy a poor show by New Zealand, a great spell by McGrath and gratuitous umpiring by Billy Bowden but they look far from the champion side they are. This is the third match in a row now that they have failed to reach 250 and third time running against NZ that they have suffered a middle-order collapse. The young hopes, Clarke and Katich somehow seem unable to turn on the magic against the Trans-Tasman rivals and Kaspro is also having an ordinary time against them (while otherwise he has been brilliant) Hence I would bring back Dizzy immediately in the team.
I think the moment has to come sooner than later that Australia's luck and the benefit they derieve from being able to intimidate opponents pschycologically will run out. They have come close several times this season - both Pak and NZ have threatened to beat Aus - and I wonder if the turning point is around the corner.
Good Work
Put Him Up There !!!
I read an article recently in The New Zealand Herald which says that Fleming is keen on Brendon McCullum opening the innings in the ODIs in the forseeable future. He goes on to say that that might not happen just yet - while Astle and himself are still going strong. My advice - put him up there immediately. New Zealand need a dasher up the order. Also Fleming and Astle are 2 of New Zealand's best ever batsmen in ODIs. It works at times (like with the Ganguly-Tendulkar duo for a long time) but not always - the 2 best players opening the innings. I think NZ would be better served if Fleming plays the crucial #3 role. That way the NZ lineup looks more middle-heavy. In fact I'd make the change as early as the next match.
Btw, Scott Styris' abscence is gonna be a big blow !!!
Saturday, February 19, 2005
‘If not Azhar, Sachin would be great’
Mohammad Ashraful's BCB side are arriving in India for the Duleep Trophy. I quote this from ExpressIndia.com Cricket
"Ask him to pick one Indian batsman he has not met and would love to. Ashraful’s quick answer is: Mohammed Azharuddin. ‘‘He played some wonderful innings and I have heard a lot about him. I know it will be difficult but I will try and meet him during the Duleep Trophy,’’ he said. But if that doesn’t materialise, Asharful would compensate it by meeing Sachin Tendulkar. The young batsman’s turnaround in the December 2004 India series is credited with the famous Tendulkar-Ashraful chat in Dhaka. ‘‘Who would not want to meet him, he is an institution. Not just me, the whole team will learn something from him,’’ said Ashraful."
Click here for a link to the complete article.
Frightening
And on a happy sidenote, an extremely exciting ODI - maybe there might be a renaissance of some sorts in ODI cricket waiting to happen. Again as I have theorized many times the best matches are the ones where teams score 230s and 240s not 320s and 330s.
Thursday, February 17, 2005
Wake Up India !!
Well, the BCCI (often lambasted unfairly) has really done a pathetic job this time. I wonder why this new trend of delaying all matters to the eleventh hour has started - not only have the venues not been finalised; they haven't announced the date for the team declaration, they haven't even announced the team for the side game. Of course, the whole mess about the TV rights continues - but one would have thought at least they would get these other issues in order. The players are also surprisingly restrained about the whole thing on either side - no grand proclamations from Ganguly - or no hollow threats from Shaoib Akhtar - no everyday update and gossip about Sachin's fitness ... COME ON ... HAS EVERYONE FALLEN ASLEEP ??
Finally I hope that India will be just as gracious and hospitable to Pakistan off the field as they were last year though very different on it. Here is an article on Cricinfo on this issue. I find it pretty interesting - particularly the part where he explains how the grand welcome the Indians received from the common Pakistani was a sudden unexpected and unplanned outpour of emotion. He goes on to say that this phenomenon can be explained scientifically - in fact it has been in the book The Tipping Point where a series of small uncoordinated events culminates in a widespread outpouring - very interesting I must read this once !!! What we would like is a repeat of Delhi 1999 or even Chennai 1999 but certainly not Kolkata 1999.
Revised Teams
Here are my revised teams to play Australia in the Super Series:
Test:
Sehwag
Strauss
Lara (capt)
Tendulkar
Dravid
Kallis
Sangakarra
Pollock
Kumble
Akhtar
Murali
ODIs:
Tendulkar
Fleming (capt)
Sarwan
Kallis
Youhana
Flintoff
Sangakarra
Pollock
Vaas
Akhtar
Murali
A New Start ...
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
OH NO !!!
I also do not think too highly about Shib Shankar Paul - and guess what, he has come up with a 6-wkt haul as well !!! God help me !! Well, I think with Zaheer Khan and Irfan Pathan (subject to fitness) sure to pick up the first 2 seamers' spots, Nehra, Paul and Balaji would fight for 2 places - I think the selectors will go with Nehra in the end - as Balaji is also coming back after an injury and it would be too risky to go with 2 bowlers coming back after an injury !!!
If you want more details of why I hate Ashish Nehra and the list of his poor performances, ask me. I could write a new post on that.
Tuesday, February 15, 2005
Interesting ...
Here is an article in support of this idea appearing in The Times.
Sunday, February 13, 2005
He Has A Point You Know !!!
Just to recollect a few horrendous decisions in recent times:
1) The way Steve Bucknor helped Australia save the Sydney Test in January 2004
2) The way David Shepherd gave a palpably plump Ricky Ponting not out in Adelaide on 0 when he went on to score a 240
3) The way Ganguly stood in total disbelief after David Orchard gave him out lbw although he was about half a kilometre down the wicket
And this is not just cribbing about poor decisions against India so:
4) The way Marcus Trescothick was given out at Kolkata in January 2002 when the ball had clearly pitched outside leg.
5) Even the best make mistakes - The way Venkat gave Mark Waugh out caught bat pad in the Chennai Test of 1998.
6) Also the dodgy decision by Javed Akhtar to give Graham Thorpe out lbw to put England out of the 1999 WC and India into the Super Six
Point is - it is not home country umpires that are the problem - let us assume all umpires are neutral - it is the poor quality of umpiring that is the problem. Let us face it - today there exist only 2 good umpires in the World - Simon Taufel and Rudi Koertzen - the rest are in varying degrees poor - now that Venkat has retired and Bucknor and Shepherd have gone from being pretty good to pathetic.
I would not concur with Woolmer entirely. In particular, I do not support his idea that the third umpire with technology at hand should have power to overrule umpires. What I think can be done to improve the umpiring, is utilize this technology to evaluate the performance of the umpires in an objective, unbiased and transparent manner. Currently, the captains rate the umpires on a scale of 1 to 10 (I think). This information is considered top secret for reasons unknown - although it not always remains so - remember Ganguly giving umpire Bucknow a 0 last year ?? Well, anyway insted of having this secretive and subjective assessment, why not have an open and objective one ?? Why not have a review at the end of every series which says that umpire A had to adjudicate on say 50 decisions and got 35 right, 12 wrong and 3 uncertain - or something like that. For certain decisions which are not conclusive even after the technology, the umpires could be given the benefit of the doubt or a probability value of the decision being correct could be associated with it.
Based on the performance of the umpires, the ICC can decide whether to continue with them or opt for new ones. Of course, those who have been dropped would be eligible for consideration in the future again by good performances at the first-class level and so on. A selection commitee could be appointed to make these decisions. So that they will use the stats so obtained as a guide in making their decisions. Just as players figures in first class cricket or their performances are a guide to selection in the national team, so will be the situation with umpires. Of course then if a very senior umpire has a really bad series he could still hold on to his place based on his reputation since there is a human element involved. However 3 or 4 bad series in a row will not be tolerated. The key idea here is make the numbers public; make that objective and then let the selectors follow a subjective procedure.
Of course something similar could already be in place (the way Asoka Desilva was shown the door after a series of poor performances is indeed heartening) - the main complaint would still be the lack of transparency in decision-making. We all know Steve Bucknor had a poor series Down Under last year - why not the ICC publish their figures and assessment to the public to check if they are on the same wavelength with their patrons ??
If anyone having anything to do with the bosses at the ICC are reading this, I would request them to please consider this suggestion seriously.
Saturday, February 12, 2005
"Murali No Chucker"
It's Shane Warne who's saying it - so the words should count for something. Mr. Bedi we are looking forward to more entertainment from your mouth !!!
What A Shame !
Friday, February 11, 2005
3 In A Row ...
Dravid and Kaif have combined for the third match in a row to take India A home and to the Challenger Trophy glory. Hope the Super Duo keeps their good form going and take us to victory in the matches against Pakistan.
The series ends with finally the bowlers playing some kind of role in the game. Zaheer impressive; the new guy Rudra Pratap - also a left-armer - good; gosh why are all up-and-coming Indian seamers left arm ??
New Balls (Bowlers) Please
Clealry the English management does not agree with my views. In an earlier post I had said that Andersen and Wharf need to play in the last few ODIs for England. Well they stuck with Hoggy and Ali and the result another loss - built once again on a largely lacklustre bowling performance.
Let me make one thing clear. I am not for a moment implying that Wharf and Andersen are champion bowlers. They are definitely not as good as Hoggard so far in their careers. However the important point is Hoggard is justifiably tired after playing a major role in a gruelling Test Series. Very understandably the body and mind will be just a little bit less than 100% after such an ordeal in the relatively less important ODI series. Clearly one of the major reasons for South Africa's success is that they lost the Test Series and hence are desperate to salvage some pride and prove a point. Clearly the English do not feel that urgency. Little surprise that the 2 star turns for England have been those that did not play in the Tests (Gough and Pietersen).
In such circumstances clearly the fresh faces of Andersen and Wharf need to be played simply because they would be the most eager to prove a point. As I said it is about bringing new new ball bowlers. (not necessarily more accomplished ones).